Cayman Islands vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 15-64, female, per capita

Cayman Islands
0.3674 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.3372 units per person
in 2025
Cayman Islands rank
5th
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
8th

Population ages 15-64, female, per capita over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.10.20.30.4196019922025

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.3674 units per person against 0.3372 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0302 units per person.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 5th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 8th of 217 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2935 units per person 0.2694 units per person 0.024 units per person Cayman Islands
1970s 0.3055 units per person 0.2735 units per person 0.032 units per person Cayman Islands
1980s 0.3429 units per person 0.3028 units per person 0.0402 units per person Cayman Islands
1990s 0.3739 units per person 0.3204 units per person 0.0535 units per person Cayman Islands
2000s 0.3837 units per person 0.3408 units per person 0.0429 units per person Cayman Islands
2010s 0.3824 units per person 0.3445 units per person 0.0379 units per person Cayman Islands
2020s 0.3721 units per person 0.3361 units per person 0.0361 units per person Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per capita, Cayman Islands or East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Cayman Islands, at 0.3674 units per person against 0.3372 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per capita between Cayman Islands and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0302 units per person, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Cayman Islands and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per capita?
Cayman Islands ranks 5th and East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 8th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 15-64, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-capita/cayman-islands/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-capita/cayman-islands/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Cayman Islands vs East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 15-64, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.