Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
4.2 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
4.14 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
99th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
100th

Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
1234196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 4.2 units per square kilometre against 4.14 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.06 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 100th of 216 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8642 units per square kilometre 0.6643 units per square kilometre 0.1999 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 1.18 units per square kilometre 0.8425 units per square kilometre 0.3364 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 1.51 units per square kilometre 1.28 units per square kilometre 0.2325 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 2.08 units per square kilometre 1.91 units per square kilometre 0.1695 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 2.67 units per square kilometre 2.38 units per square kilometre 0.2909 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 3.38 units per square kilometre 3.16 units per square kilometre 0.2144 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 4.03 units per square kilometre 3.96 units per square kilometre 0.0687 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Guinea-Bissau, at 4.2 units per square kilometre against 4.14 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.06 units per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 100th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-19-male-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-19-male-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/tanzania/">Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-19, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-19, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.