Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
22nd
Rwanda rank
19th

Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
  • Rwanda
00.0010.0010.002196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 13.1 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 19th of 43 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0012 units per US$ of GDP 0.0011 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0007 units per US$ of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP 0.0003 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-19, female, per unit of gdp, Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 15-19, female, per unit of gdp between Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 15-19, female, per unit of gdp?
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 19th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-19-female-per-unit-of-gdp/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-19-female-per-unit-of-gdp/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/rwanda/">Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-19, female, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 14,520 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-19, female divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.