Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre

Congo
1.18 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.17 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
179th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
180th

Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.18 units per square kilometre against 1.17 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.01 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Congo ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 216 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2114 units per square kilometre 0.3873 units per square kilometre 0.1759 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.2881 units per square kilometre 0.4972 units per square kilometre 0.209 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.388 units per square kilometre 0.5898 units per square kilometre 0.2018 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.501 units per square kilometre 0.6536 units per square kilometre 0.1526 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.6405 units per square kilometre 0.9376 units per square kilometre 0.2971 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.8439 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre 0.3306 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.12 units per square kilometre 1.21 units per square kilometre 0.0905 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre, Congo or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Congo, at 1.18 units per square kilometre against 1.17 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre between Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.01 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-10-14-male-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-10-14-male-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 10-14, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 10-14, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.