Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre

Congo
1.24 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.29 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
177th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
174th

Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.29 units per square kilometre against 1.24 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.05 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Congo ranks 177th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 174th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2533 units per square kilometre 0.4743 units per square kilometre 0.221 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.3473 units per square kilometre 0.5321 units per square kilometre 0.1848 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.4508 units per square kilometre 0.5625 units per square kilometre 0.1117 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.5716 units per square kilometre 0.7553 units per square kilometre 0.1837 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.7257 units per square kilometre 1.07 units per square kilometre 0.3395 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 1.03 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 0.1225 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.24 units per square kilometre 1.22 units per square kilometre 0.0209 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre, Congo or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.29 units per square kilometre against 1.24 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre between Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.05 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 177th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 174th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-05-09-male-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-05-09-male-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 05-09, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 05-09, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.