Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
1.38 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.33 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
169th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
172nd

Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 1.38 units per square kilometre against 1.33 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.05 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 169th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.4619 units per square kilometre 0.8804 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 1.46 units per square kilometre 0.4938 units per square kilometre 0.9653 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.542 units per square kilometre 0.7986 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 1.29 units per square kilometre 0.7105 units per square kilometre 0.5746 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 1.27 units per square kilometre 1.07 units per square kilometre 0.1984 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 1.23 units per square kilometre 1.24 units per square kilometre 0.0154 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.32 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.0228 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 1.38 units per square kilometre against 1.33 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.05 units per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 169th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-05-09-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-05-09-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 05-09, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 05-09, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.