East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 00-04, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0245 units per person
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0.0683 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
35th
Guinea-Bissau rank
32nd

Population ages 00-04, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.020.040.060.080.1196019922025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.0683 units per person against 0.0245 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0438 units per person.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 2.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd of 43 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0818 units per person 0.0819 units per person 0.0001 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0741 units per person 0.0836 units per person 0.0095 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0584 units per person 0.093 units per person 0.0346 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0511 units per person 0.0899 units per person 0.0387 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0394 units per person 0.0862 units per person 0.0468 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0384 units per person 0.0804 units per person 0.042 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.029 units per person 0.0706 units per person 0.0416 units per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 00-04, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.0683 units per person against 0.0245 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 00-04, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0438 units per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for population ages 00-04, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 35th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 32nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 00-04, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 00-04, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-00-04-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-00-04-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 00-04, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 00-04, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 00-04, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.