IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 00-04, female
IBRD only
6.1%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
13.2%
in 2025
IBRD only rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd
Population ages 00-04, female over time
- IBRD only
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 13.2% against 6.1% in IBRD only, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.1 times IBRD only's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 47 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.1% | 19.1% | 3.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 14.0% | 18.8% | 4.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 12.3% | 18.1% | 5.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 10.6% | 14.4% | 3.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 8.7% | 15.1% | 6.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 8.1% | 15.2% | 7.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 13.4% | 6.7% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 00-04, female, IBRD only or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 13.2% against 6.1% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in population ages 00-04, female between IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
- 7.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and Zimbabwe rank globally for population ages 00-04, female?
- IBRD only ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Population ages 00-04, female (% of female population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female population between the ages 0 to 4 as a percentage of the total female population.