Congo vs Faroe Islands: Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre

Congo
1.28 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands
1.26 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
171st
Faroe Islands rank
172nd

Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Faroe Islands
0.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.28 units per square kilometre against 1.26 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Congo ranks 171st and Faroe Islands ranks 172nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3132 units per square kilometre 1.43 units per square kilometre 1.12 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.425 units per square kilometre 1.4 units per square kilometre 0.9745 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.5113 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.7846 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.6566 units per square kilometre 1.32 units per square kilometre 0.6588 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.8522 units per square kilometre 1.22 units per square kilometre 0.3642 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 1.19 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 0.0245 units per square kilometre Congo
2020s 1.26 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.0365 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre, Congo or Faroe Islands?
Congo, at 1.28 units per square kilometre against 1.26 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre between Congo and Faroe Islands?
0.02 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Faroe Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Faroe Islands rank globally for population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 171st and Faroe Islands ranks 172nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Faroe Islands: Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-00-04-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-00-04-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/faroe-islands/">Congo vs Faroe Islands: Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 00-04, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 00-04, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.