Tanzania, United Republic of vs Timor-Leste: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Tanzania, United Republic of
32.13 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
31.87 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
86th
Timor-Leste rank
87th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Timor-Leste
102030196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 32.13 units per square kilometre against 31.87 units per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.26 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 86th and Timor-Leste ranks 87th of 215 countries.

Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 5.89 units per square kilometre 13.38 units per square kilometre 7.49 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
1970s 8.34 units per square kilometre 15.64 units per square kilometre 7.3 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
1980s 11.83 units per square kilometre 18.49 units per square kilometre 6.66 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
1990s 15.13 units per square kilometre 24.31 units per square kilometre 9.18 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2000s 19.63 units per square kilometre 26.41 units per square kilometre 6.77 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 25.89 units per square kilometre 31.46 units per square kilometre 5.57 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 30.98 units per square kilometre 32.06 units per square kilometre 1.07 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Tanzania, United Republic of or Timor-Leste?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 32.13 units per square kilometre against 31.87 units per square kilometre in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Tanzania, United Republic of and Timor-Leste?
0.26 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Timor-Leste?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Timor-Leste rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 86th and Timor-Leste ranks 87th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Timor-Leste: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/timor-leste/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Timor-Leste: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.