Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
22.17 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
213.43 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
16th
Rwanda rank
13th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Rwanda
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 213.43 units per square kilometre against 22.17 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 191.26 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 9.6 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 7.23 units per square kilometre 69.89 units per square kilometre 62.66 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 9.44 units per square kilometre 86.77 units per square kilometre 77.33 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 12.2 units per square kilometre 121.62 units per square kilometre 109.42 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 14.84 units per square kilometre 148.03 units per square kilometre 133.19 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 18.06 units per square kilometre 159.4 units per square kilometre 141.34 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 19.61 units per square kilometre 192.06 units per square kilometre 172.45 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 21.62 units per square kilometre 210.28 units per square kilometre 188.66 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 213.43 units per square kilometre against 22.17 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Rwanda?
191.26 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/">Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.