Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
19.73 units per square kilometre
in 2023
India
121.2 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
23rd
India rank
20th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • India
050100150196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 121.2 units per square kilometre against 19.73 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 101.47 units per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 6.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and India ranks 20th of 45 groups.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) India Difference Ahead
1960s 5.01 units per square kilometre 68.34 units per square kilometre 63.33 units per square kilometre India
1970s 6.65 units per square kilometre 82.9 units per square kilometre 76.24 units per square kilometre India
1980s 8.8 units per square kilometre 101.08 units per square kilometre 92.28 units per square kilometre India
1990s 11.13 units per square kilometre 119.45 units per square kilometre 108.32 units per square kilometre India
2000s 14.3 units per square kilometre 129.54 units per square kilometre 115.23 units per square kilometre India
2010s 16.79 units per square kilometre 128.98 units per square kilometre 112.19 units per square kilometre India
2020s 19.17 units per square kilometre 122.72 units per square kilometre 103.55 units per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or India?
India, at 121.2 units per square kilometre against 19.73 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India?
101.47 units per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and India ranks 20th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/india/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.