Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Early-demographic dividend
29.17 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar
684.5 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
5th
Gibraltar rank
5th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Gibraltar
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 684.5 units per square kilometre against 29.17 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 655.33 units per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 23.5 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 5th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 45 groups.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Gibraltar Difference Ahead
1960s 15.04 units per square kilometre 609.68 units per square kilometre 594.63 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 18.9 units per square kilometre 706.26 units per square kilometre 687.36 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 23.37 units per square kilometre 656.02 units per square kilometre 632.65 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 26.45 units per square kilometre 542.53 units per square kilometre 516.08 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 28.01 units per square kilometre 539.62 units per square kilometre 511.61 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 29.09 units per square kilometre 602.64 units per square kilometre 573.55 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 29.24 units per square kilometre 670.33 units per square kilometre 641.09 units per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Early-demographic dividend or Gibraltar?
Gibraltar, at 684.5 units per square kilometre against 29.17 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar?
655.33 units per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 5th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/gibraltar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/gibraltar/">Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.