Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Cuba
16.47 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17.46 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
128th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17.46 units per square kilometre against 16.47 units per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.99 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 27.82 units per square kilometre 5.6 units per square kilometre 22.22 units per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 31.77 units per square kilometre 7.47 units per square kilometre 24.31 units per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 25.35 units per square kilometre 10.59 units per square kilometre 14.76 units per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 22.46 units per square kilometre 12.89 units per square kilometre 9.57 units per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 20.61 units per square kilometre 13.5 units per square kilometre 7.11 units per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 18.08 units per square kilometre 16.06 units per square kilometre 2.02 units per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 16.78 units per square kilometre 17.19 units per square kilometre 0.4129 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17.46 units per square kilometre against 16.47 units per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
0.99 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.