Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Congo
7.4 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
7.89 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
174th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
171st

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
2468196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 7.89 units per square kilometre against 7.4 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.49 units per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 174th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 171st of 215 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 1.56 units per square kilometre 2.71 units per square kilometre 1.15 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 2.12 units per square kilometre 2.98 units per square kilometre 0.8547 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 2.7 units per square kilometre 3.43 units per square kilometre 0.735 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 3.45 units per square kilometre 4.47 units per square kilometre 1.03 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 4.43 units per square kilometre 6.28 units per square kilometre 1.85 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 6.13 units per square kilometre 7.31 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 7.22 units per square kilometre 7.86 units per square kilometre 0.6377 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Congo or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 7.89 units per square kilometre against 7.4 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.49 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 174th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 171st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Congo vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.