Aruba vs Uganda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Aruba
102.5 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
106.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
29th
Uganda rank
27th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Uganda
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 106.62 units per square kilometre against 102.5 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 4.12 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 29th and Uganda ranks 27th of 215 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 129.1 units per square kilometre 20.76 units per square kilometre 108.34 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 109.82 units per square kilometre 27.47 units per square kilometre 82.35 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 90.05 units per square kilometre 35.92 units per square kilometre 54.13 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 111.11 units per square kilometre 50 units per square kilometre 61.11 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 118.04 units per square kilometre 69.11 units per square kilometre 48.93 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 114.3 units per square kilometre 89.01 units per square kilometre 25.29 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 106.08 units per square kilometre 103.46 units per square kilometre 2.62 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Aruba or Uganda?
Uganda, at 106.62 units per square kilometre against 102.5 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Aruba and Uganda?
4.12 units per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Uganda rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 29th and Uganda ranks 27th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Uganda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/aruba/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/aruba/uganda/">Aruba vs Uganda: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.