Aruba vs Mauritius: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre

Aruba
102.5 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
94.57 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
29th
Mauritius rank
30th

Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Mauritius
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 102.5 units per square kilometre against 94.57 units per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 7.93 units per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Aruba ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 129.1 units per square kilometre 162.83 units per square kilometre 33.73 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 109.82 units per square kilometre 164.77 units per square kilometre 54.95 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 90.05 units per square kilometre 158.22 units per square kilometre 68.17 units per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 111.11 units per square kilometre 152.51 units per square kilometre 41.4 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 118.04 units per square kilometre 143.72 units per square kilometre 25.68 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 114.3 units per square kilometre 119.83 units per square kilometre 5.53 units per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 106.08 units per square kilometre 99.2 units per square kilometre 6.88 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre, Aruba or Mauritius?
Aruba, at 102.5 units per square kilometre against 94.57 units per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre between Aruba and Mauritius?
7.93 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Mauritius rank globally for population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 30th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Mauritius: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/aruba/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-total-per-square-kilometre/aruba/mauritius/">Aruba vs Mauritius: Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.