East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0955 units per person
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0.1941 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
36th
Guinea-Bissau rank
34th

Population ages 0-14, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.050.10.150.20.25196019922025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.1941 units per person against 0.0955 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0986 units per person.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 2.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2117 units per person 0.1989 units per person 0.0127 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.2075 units per person 0.215 units per person 0.0075 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.1744 units per person 0.2304 units per person 0.056 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.153 units per person 0.2276 units per person 0.0746 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.1257 units per person 0.2215 units per person 0.0958 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.1115 units per person 0.2133 units per person 0.1019 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.102 units per person 0.1997 units per person 0.0977 units per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.1941 units per person against 0.0955 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0986 units per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for population ages 0-14, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 36th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 34th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.