Puerto Rico vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre

Puerto Rico
21.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
23.59 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
65th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd

Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 23.59 units per square kilometre against 21.08 units per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 2.51 units per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 65th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 56.74 units per square kilometre 38.28 units per square kilometre 18.46 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 56.57 units per square kilometre 38.2 units per square kilometre 18.36 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 55.21 units per square kilometre 38.86 units per square kilometre 16.35 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 51.48 units per square kilometre 38.03 units per square kilometre 13.45 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 45.89 units per square kilometre 28.74 units per square kilometre 17.15 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 32.74 units per square kilometre 25.26 units per square kilometre 7.48 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 22.47 units per square kilometre 24.07 units per square kilometre 1.6 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre, Puerto Rico or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 23.59 units per square kilometre against 21.08 units per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre between Puerto Rico and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.51 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre?
Puerto Rico ranks 65th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/trinidad-and-tobago/">Puerto Rico vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.