Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
9.75 units per square kilometre
in 2023
India
58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
23rd
India rank
21st

Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • India
0204060196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 58 units per square kilometre against 9.75 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 48.25 units per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 5.9 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and India ranks 21st of 45 groups.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) India Difference Ahead
1960s 2.5 units per square kilometre 33.04 units per square kilometre 30.54 units per square kilometre India
1970s 3.31 units per square kilometre 40.09 units per square kilometre 36.78 units per square kilometre India
1980s 4.37 units per square kilometre 48.68 units per square kilometre 44.3 units per square kilometre India
1990s 5.52 units per square kilometre 57.25 units per square kilometre 51.73 units per square kilometre India
2000s 7.09 units per square kilometre 61.76 units per square kilometre 54.67 units per square kilometre India
2010s 8.31 units per square kilometre 61.45 units per square kilometre 53.15 units per square kilometre India
2020s 9.48 units per square kilometre 58.67 units per square kilometre 49.2 units per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or India?
India, at 58 units per square kilometre against 9.75 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India?
48.25 units per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and India rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 23rd and India ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/india/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs India: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.