Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
3.9 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
4.04 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
171st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
169th

Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
1234196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 4.04 units per square kilometre against 3.9 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.14 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 171st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 169th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 4.05 units per square kilometre 1.33 units per square kilometre 2.72 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 4.26 units per square kilometre 1.45 units per square kilometre 2.81 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 4.06 units per square kilometre 1.68 units per square kilometre 2.38 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 3.82 units per square kilometre 2.19 units per square kilometre 1.63 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 3.83 units per square kilometre 3.12 units per square kilometre 0.7054 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 3.66 units per square kilometre 3.77 units per square kilometre 0.1166 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 3.92 units per square kilometre 4.06 units per square kilometre 0.1341 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 4.04 units per square kilometre against 3.9 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.14 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 171st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 169th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.