Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
24.51 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
23.59 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
59th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd

Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Trinidad and Tobago
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 24.51 units per square kilometre against 23.59 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.92 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 59th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 7.39 units per square kilometre 38.28 units per square kilometre 30.9 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 9.35 units per square kilometre 38.2 units per square kilometre 28.85 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 11.08 units per square kilometre 38.86 units per square kilometre 27.78 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 13.73 units per square kilometre 38.03 units per square kilometre 24.3 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 18.16 units per square kilometre 28.74 units per square kilometre 10.58 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 22.12 units per square kilometre 25.26 units per square kilometre 3.13 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 23.88 units per square kilometre 24.07 units per square kilometre 0.1928 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cayman Islands, at 24.51 units per square kilometre against 23.59 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.92 units per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 59th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cayman Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.