Bermuda vs Least developed countries: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre

Bermuda
80.98 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
10.92 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
16th
Least developed countries rank
16th

Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Least developed countries
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 80.98 units per square kilometre against 10.92 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 70.06 units per square kilometre.

That makes Bermuda's figure about 7.4 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bermuda has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 16th and Least developed countries ranks 16th of 215 countries.

Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1960s 136.14 units per square kilometre 3.59 units per square kilometre 132.55 units per square kilometre Bermuda
1970s 126.73 units per square kilometre 4.67 units per square kilometre 122.06 units per square kilometre Bermuda
1980s 105.03 units per square kilometre 6.03 units per square kilometre 99 units per square kilometre Bermuda
1990s 105.68 units per square kilometre 7.33 units per square kilometre 98.35 units per square kilometre Bermuda
2000s 103.6 units per square kilometre 8.93 units per square kilometre 94.67 units per square kilometre Bermuda
2010s 88.24 units per square kilometre 9.68 units per square kilometre 78.56 units per square kilometre Bermuda
2020s 82.54 units per square kilometre 10.65 units per square kilometre 71.89 units per square kilometre Bermuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre, Bermuda or Least developed countries?
Bermuda, at 80.98 units per square kilometre against 10.92 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre between Bermuda and Least developed countries?
70.06 units per square kilometre, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Least developed countries?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Least developed countries rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 16th and Least developed countries ranks 16th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Least developed countries: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Bermuda vs Least developed countries: Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.