Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, female, per capita

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.1107 units per person
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0.1892 units per person
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
28th
Guinea-Bissau rank
31st

Population ages 0-14, female, per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.050.10.150.20.25196019922025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.1892 units per person against 0.1107 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0785 units per person.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.7 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 31st of 45 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1706 units per person 0.1995 units per person 0.0288 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.1611 units per person 0.2117 units per person 0.0505 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.152 units per person 0.2264 units per person 0.0744 units per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.1447 units per person 0.2253 units per person 0.0807 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.1209 units per person 0.2182 units per person 0.0973 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.1113 units per person 0.209 units per person 0.0977 units per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.1125 units per person 0.1949 units per person 0.0824 units per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per capita, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.1892 units per person against 0.1107 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per capita between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0785 units per person, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 31st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/guinea-bissau/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Guinea-Bissau: Population ages 0-14, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.