Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 0-14, female, per capita

Congo
0.1979 units per person
in 2025
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0.1099 units per person
in 2025
Congo rank
26th
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
29th

Population ages 0-14, female, per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
00.050.10.150.20.25196019922025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.1979 units per person against 0.1099 units per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0.088 units per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ahead.

Congo ranks 26th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 29th of 217 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.218 units per person 0.216 units per person 0.002 units per person Congo
1970s 0.2259 units per person 0.2075 units per person 0.0184 units per person Congo
1980s 0.2225 units per person 0.1912 units per person 0.0313 units per person Congo
1990s 0.2156 units per person 0.172 units per person 0.0436 units per person Congo
2000s 0.2055 units per person 0.1497 units per person 0.0559 units per person Congo
2010s 0.2061 units per person 0.1284 units per person 0.0778 units per person Congo
2020s 0.2031 units per person 0.1143 units per person 0.0888 units per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 0-14, female, per capita, Congo or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
Congo, at 0.1979 units per person against 0.1099 units per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 0-14, female, per capita between Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
0.088 units per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 0-14, female, per capita?
Congo ranks 26th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 29th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 0-14, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 0-14, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-capita/congo-rep/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-0-14-female-per-capita/congo-rep/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/">Congo vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 0-14, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 0-14, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 0-14, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.