Belarus vs China: Polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (IPVc)
Belarus
98.0%
in 2025
China
98.0%
in 2025
Belarus rank
16th
China rank
16th
Polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (IPVc) over time
- Belarus
- China
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 98.0% against 98.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 16th and China ranks 16th of 194 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (ipvc), Belarus or China?
- Belarus, at 98.0% against 98.0% in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (ipvc) between Belarus and China?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and China rank globally for polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (ipvc)?
- Belarus ranks 16th and China ranks 16th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Polio vaccine: inactivated second or third-dose polio vaccine (IPVc) immunization coverage by the locally recommended age (%) (WUENIC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.