Sur vs Zimbabwe: Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week
Sur
31.2%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
45.7%
in 2025
Sur rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
2nd
Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week over time
- Sur
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 45.7% against 31.2% in Sur, a difference of 14.5%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Sur's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Sur ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sur | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.0% | 44.6% | 13.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 31.1% | 45.5% | 14.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, Sur or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 45.7% against 31.2% in Sur as of 2025.
- What is the difference in physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week between Sur and Zimbabwe?
- 14.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sur and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Sur and Zimbabwe rank globally for physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week?
- Sur ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 1 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.