Low income (World Bank) vs Zimbabwe: Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week
Low income (World Bank)
32.0%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
45.7%
in 2025
Low income (World Bank) rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
2nd
Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 45.7% against 32.0% in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 13.7%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.5% | 44.6% | 13.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 31.9% | 45.5% | 13.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, Low income (World Bank) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 45.7% against 32.0% in Low income (World Bank) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week between Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe?
- 13.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Zimbabwe rank globally for physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.