Low income (World Bank) vs Nauru: Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week
Low income (World Bank)
32.0%
in 2025
Nauru
41.2%
in 2025
Low income (World Bank) rank
4th
Nauru rank
3rd
Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 41.2% against 32.0% in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.3 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Nauru ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.5% | 43.0% | 11.5% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 31.9% | 41.8% | 9.9% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, Low income (World Bank) or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 41.2% against 32.0% in Low income (World Bank) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week between Low income (World Bank) and Nauru?
- 9.2%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Nauru?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Nauru rank globally for physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 4th and Nauru ranks 3rd of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Physical activity among adolescents, no active days in the past week, prevalence (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.