Ecuador vs Namibia: Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health
Ecuador
60
in 2022
Namibia
55
in 2022
Ecuador rank
19th
Namibia rank
22nd
Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 60 against 55 in Namibia, a difference of 5.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 103 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 60 | 55 | 5 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 60 | 55 | 5 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 60 against 55 in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 5, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of smokeless tobacco packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.