New Zealand vs Sur: Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health
New Zealand
100
in 2022
Sur
50
in 2022
New Zealand rank
1st
Sur rank
2nd
Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health over time
- New Zealand
- Sur
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 50 in Sur, a difference of 50.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.0 times Sur's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 142 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sur | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.33 | 50 | 43.33 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 100 | 50 | 50 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health, New Zealand or Sur?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 50 in Sur as of 2022.
- What is the difference in percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health between New Zealand and Sur?
- 50, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sur?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Sur rank globally for percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Sur ranks 2nd of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of cigarette packaging. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.