Amapá vs Sweden: % of Triple bacterial DTP immunization coverage
Amapá
71.34
in 2024
Sweden
90.86
in 2024
Amapá rank
11th
Sweden rank
10th
% of Triple bacterial DTP immunization coverage over time
- Amapá
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 90.86 against 71.34 in Amapá, a difference of 19.52.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Amapá's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Sweden ahead.
Amapá ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 10th of 11 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Amapá | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.99 | 72.1 | 4.11 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 73.61 | 89.31 | 15.7 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 51.98 | 74.89 | 22.91 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher % of triple bacterial dtp immunization coverage, Amapá or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 90.86 against 71.34 in Amapá as of 2024.
- What is the difference in % of triple bacterial dtp immunization coverage between Amapá and Sweden?
- 19.52, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Amapá and Sweden?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Amapá and Sweden rank globally for % of triple bacterial dtp immunization coverage?
- Amapá ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 10th of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNICEF, published as % of Triple bacterial DTP immunization coverage (Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.