Lower middle income vs Sweden: People using safely managed sanitation services, urban
People using safely managed sanitation services, urban over time
- Lower middle income
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 95.8% against 47.8% in Lower middle income, a difference of 48.0%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 2.0 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 30 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.0% | 95.9% | 62.9% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 39.9% | 95.9% | 55.9% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 46.4% | 95.8% | 49.4% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed sanitation services, urban, Lower middle income or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 95.8% against 47.8% in Lower middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed sanitation services, urban between Lower middle income and Sweden?
- 48.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lower middle income and Sweden rank globally for people using safely managed sanitation services, urban?
- Lower middle income ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.