Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: People using safely managed sanitation services, urban
People using safely managed sanitation services, urban over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 60.1% against 58.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 58th and Peru ranks 57th of 124 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.7% | 19.9% | 14.2% | Peru |
| 2010s | 29.1% | 39.5% | 10.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 57.7% | 55.6% | 2.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed sanitation services, urban, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Peru, at 60.1% against 58.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed sanitation services, urban between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 2.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for people using safely managed sanitation services, urban?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 58th and Peru ranks 57th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.