IDA & IBRD total vs Lithuania: People using safely managed sanitation services, rural
People using safely managed sanitation services, rural over time
- IDA & IBRD total
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 93.1% against 46.7% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 46.4%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.0 times IDA & IBRD total's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
IDA & IBRD total ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 8th of 26 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA & IBRD total | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.9% | 68.7% | 50.8% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 32.4% | 81.5% | 49.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 44.0% | 91.6% | 47.6% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed sanitation services, rural, IDA & IBRD total or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 93.1% against 46.7% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed sanitation services, rural between IDA & IBRD total and Lithuania?
- 46.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Lithuania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do IDA & IBRD total and Lithuania rank globally for people using safely managed sanitation services, rural?
- IDA & IBRD total ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 8th of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed sanitation services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.