Hungary vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): People using safely managed sanitation services, rural
People using safely managed sanitation services, rural over time
- Hungary
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 87.6% against 42.8% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 44.8%.
That makes Hungary's figure about 2.0 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 15th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 16th of 100 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.5% | 21.2% | 35.3% | Hungary |
| 2010s | 74.4% | 31.2% | 43.2% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 85.7% | 41.0% | 44.7% | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed sanitation services, rural, Hungary or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Hungary, at 87.6% against 42.8% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed sanitation services, rural between Hungary and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- 44.8%, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for people using safely managed sanitation services, rural?
- Hungary ranks 15th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 16th of 100 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed sanitation services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.