Papua New Guinea vs Sierra Leone: People using safely managed sanitation services
People using safely managed sanitation services over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 16.8% against 16.7% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd and Sierra Leone ranks 132nd of 146 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.2% | 6.2% | 5.1% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 10.7% | 3.3% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 16.1% | 15.4% | 0.7% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed sanitation services, Papua New Guinea or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 16.8% against 16.7% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed sanitation services between Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 0.1%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sierra Leone rank globally for people using safely managed sanitation services?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd and Sierra Leone ranks 132nd of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed sanitation services (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using improved sanitation facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or transported and treated offsite. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour flush to piped sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines: ventilated improved pit latrines, composting toilets or pit latrines with slabs.