Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zambia: People using safely managed drinking water services, urban
People using safely managed drinking water services, urban over time
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 50.2% against 46.5% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 3.7%.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 79th of 104 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turks and Caicos Islands | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.5% | 47.0% | 0.4% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 46.5% | 52.2% | 5.7% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 46.5% | 50.8% | 4.2% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, urban, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 50.2% against 46.5% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, urban between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
- 3.7%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zambia rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, urban?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 79th of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.