Africa Eastern and Southern vs Croatia: People using safely managed drinking water services, urban
People using safely managed drinking water services, urban over time
- Africa Eastern and Southern
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 96.5% against 57.9% in Africa Eastern and Southern, a difference of 38.6%.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.7 times Africa Eastern and Southern's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 21st and Croatia ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa Eastern and Southern | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.7% | 96.5% | 45.8% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 53.3% | 96.5% | 43.2% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 56.9% | 96.5% | 39.6% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, urban, Africa Eastern and Southern or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 96.5% against 57.9% in Africa Eastern and Southern as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, urban between Africa Eastern and Southern and Croatia?
- 38.6%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Eastern and Southern and Croatia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Africa Eastern and Southern and Croatia rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, urban?
- Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 21st and Croatia ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.