South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural

South Africa
50.8%
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
55.7%
in 2024
South Africa rank
35th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
33rd

People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time

  • South Africa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 55.7% against 50.8% in South Africa, a difference of 4.9%.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 35th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 85 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 47.9% 55.7% 7.8% Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 51.4% 55.7% 4.3% Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, South Africa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 55.7% against 50.8% in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
4.9%, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
South Africa ranks 35th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 33rd of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)
Unit
% of rural population
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
112 places, 2,731 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.