North Macedonia vs Ukraine: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- North Macedonia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 86.9% against 74.9% in North Macedonia, a difference of 12.0%.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 16th and Ukraine ranks 13th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.3% | 27.3% | 47.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 74.7% | 85.9% | 11.2% | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 74.9% | 87.4% | 12.5% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, North Macedonia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 86.9% against 74.9% in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between North Macedonia and Ukraine?
- 12.0%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Ukraine?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Ukraine rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- North Macedonia ranks 16th and Ukraine ranks 13th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.