Lower middle income vs Luxembourg: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- Lower middle income
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 97.9% against 65.5% in Lower middle income, a difference of 32.4%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 7th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 27 groups.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.7% | 100.0% | 61.3% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 52.3% | 99.0% | 46.6% | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 62.7% | 97.9% | 35.2% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Lower middle income or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 97.9% against 65.5% in Lower middle income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
- 32.4%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lower middle income and Luxembourg rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- Lower middle income ranks 7th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.