Low income vs Serbia: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
Low income
19.6%
in 2024
Serbia
66.0%
in 2024
Low income rank
22nd
Serbia rank
24th
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- Low income
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 66.0% against 19.6% in Low income, a difference of 46.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 3.4 times Low income's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Low income ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 24th of 27 groups.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.3% | 66.5% | 55.1% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 66.3% | 51.9% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 18.0% | 66.1% | 48.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Low income or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 66.0% against 19.6% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Low income and Serbia?
- 46.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Serbia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Low income and Serbia rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- Low income ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 24th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.