Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Palestine: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
53.8%
in 2024
Palestine
76.4%
in 2024
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
16th
Palestine rank
15th

People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time

  • Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Palestine
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 76.4% against 53.8% in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 22.6%.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.4 times Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Palestine has been ahead every year.

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th and Palestine ranks 15th of 27 groups.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 43.3% 70.6% 27.3% Palestine
2010s 48.9% 75.4% 26.5% Palestine
2020s 53.0% 76.4% 23.3% Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) or Palestine?
Palestine, at 76.4% against 53.8% in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2024.
What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Palestine?
22.6%, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Palestine?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and Palestine rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th and Palestine ranks 15th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Palestine: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/west-bank-and-gaza/">Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Palestine: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)
Unit
% of rural population
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
112 places, 2,731 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.