East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
57.5%
in 2024
Luxembourg
97.9%
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
11th
Luxembourg rank
8th

People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Luxembourg
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 97.9% against 57.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 40.4%.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 27 groups.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 43.0% 98.4% 55.4% Luxembourg
2020s 47.6% 97.9% 50.3% Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 97.9% against 57.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Luxembourg?
40.4%, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Luxembourg?
11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Luxembourg rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 11th and Luxembourg ranks 8th of 27 groups.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/luxembourg/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Luxembourg: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)
Unit
% of rural population
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
112 places, 2,731 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.