Croatia vs Uzbekistan: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
Croatia
74.0%
in 2024
Uzbekistan
74.8%
in 2024
Croatia rank
18th
Uzbekistan rank
17th
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- Croatia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 74.8% against 74.0% in Croatia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 85 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.6% | 36.1% | 36.6% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 73.9% | 55.6% | 18.4% | Croatia |
| 2020s | 74.0% | 70.7% | 3.3% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Croatia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 74.8% against 74.0% in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.8%, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uzbekistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Uzbekistan rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- Croatia ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.