Brazil vs North Macedonia: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural

Brazil
73.6%
in 2024
North Macedonia
74.9%
in 2024
Brazil rank
19th
North Macedonia rank
16th

People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time

  • Brazil
  • North Macedonia
020406080200020122024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 74.9% against 73.6% in Brazil, a difference of 1.3%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 19th and North Macedonia ranks 16th of 85 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 54.5% 74.3% 19.8% North Macedonia
2010s 63.6% 74.7% 11.1% North Macedonia
2020s 71.5% 74.9% 3.3% North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Brazil or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 74.9% against 73.6% in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Brazil and North Macedonia?
1.3%, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and North Macedonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Brazil and North Macedonia rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
Brazil ranks 19th and North Macedonia ranks 16th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs North Macedonia: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural. Statizoid, drawing on WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/brazil/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/people-using-safely-managed-drinking-water-services-rural-percent-of-rural-population/brazil/north-macedonia/">Brazil vs North Macedonia: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)
Unit
% of rural population
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
112 places, 2,731 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.