Bhutan vs Trinidad and Tobago: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- Bhutan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 68.9% against 65.1% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Bhutan ranks 22nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 64.9% | 38.9% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 46.3% | 65.0% | 18.7% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 72.3% | 65.1% | 7.2% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Bhutan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Bhutan, at 68.9% against 65.1% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 3.8%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- Bhutan ranks 22nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.