Afghanistan vs Eswatini: People using safely managed drinking water services, rural
People using safely managed drinking water services, rural over time
- Afghanistan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 28.4% against 25.3% in Eswatini, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 51st and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.6% | 16.9% | 5.2% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 20.3% | 21.2% | 0.9% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 26.7% | 24.5% | 2.2% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using safely managed drinking water services, rural, Afghanistan or Eswatini?
- Afghanistan, at 28.4% against 25.3% in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in people using safely managed drinking water services, rural between Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 3.1%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Eswatini rank globally for people using safely managed drinking water services, rural?
- Afghanistan ranks 51st and Eswatini ranks 53rd of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, World Health Organization (WHO), published as People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The percentage of people using drinking water from an improved source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from fecal and priority chemical contamination. Improved water sources include piped water, boreholes or tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, and packaged or delivered water.