Mongolia vs Sao Tome and Principe: People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of)
Mongolia
84.2%
in 2017
Sao Tome and Principe
84.1%
in 2017
Mongolia rank
61st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
62nd
People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) over time
- Mongolia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 84.2% against 84.1% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Mongolia ranks 61st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 62nd of 97 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.6% | 71.9% | 9.3% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 79.3% | 81.9% | 2.6% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher people using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of), Mongolia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Mongolia, at 84.2% against 84.1% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2017.
- What is the difference in people using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of) between Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for people using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of)?
- Mongolia ranks 61st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 62nd of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (washdata.org), published as People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of rural population): Q5 (highest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.